Skip to main content

Executive brief

Enterprise deployment

private deployment, access control, integration planning, governance, and support for regulated teams

Scope

Bounded estate

Systems, owners, artifacts, and controls in scope

Method

Source plus SME

Code evidence paired with expert context

Evidence

Source backed

Findings tied to code, jobs, data, and reviews

Output

Retention package

Documentation written for handoff and review

Scope

Start with the assets that carry business behavior.

A useful assessment shows where the legacy behavior sits, which teams depend on it, and what proof is needed before change.

01

Application estate

Legacy estate

COBOL programs, copybooks, JCL, CICS screens, DB2 or VSAM data, scheduler metadata

Decision support

Show what the system does and where the critical rules live

02

Operating workflow

Legacy estate

Batch windows, online transactions, files, reports, controls, exception paths, and handoffs

Decision support

Protect service levels, release windows, and audit expectations

03

Retention path

Legacy estate

Known experts, operating routines, testing gaps, owner decisions, and open questions

Decision support

Choose what to document, validate, hand off, and review first

Assessment path

A short sequence from unclear estate to usable evidence.

The work is scoped enough to move quickly, but specific enough for engineering, audit, and business owners.

Assessment path · 01 / 04

Define the estate

Business impact

Agree on systems, repositories, jobs, files, owners, and the decision the assessment must support.

Assessment outputs

A readable list of programs, jobs, copybooks, interfaces, data stores, owners, and unresolved gaps.

Assessment path · 02 / 04

Analyze the source

Business impact

Build dependency, lineage, control-flow, and business-rule views from source artifacts.

Assessment outputs

Source-backed paths that show how data, rules, jobs, transactions, reports, and downstream systems connect.

Assessment path · 03 / 04

Review with experts

Business impact

Validate findings with application, operations, data, and audit stakeholders.

Assessment outputs

Plain-language findings on fragile logic, weak evidence, missing ownership, batch constraints, and audit exposure.

Assessment path · 04 / 04

Publish the package

Business impact

Deliver maps, rule catalogs, runbooks, interview notes, risks, open questions, and a practical next-step plan.

Assessment outputs

A summary of artifacts, reviewers, dependencies, open questions, and the next work plan for controlled rollout.

Assessment outputs

Concrete artifacts, not loose advice.

Each output is written so a buyer can use it in a planning meeting, audit review, or knowledge handoff.

  1. Inventory and ownership map

    A readable list of programs, jobs, copybooks, interfaces, data stores, owners, and unresolved gaps.

  2. Dependency and lineage views

    Source-backed paths that show how data, rules, jobs, transactions, reports, and downstream systems connect.

  3. Risk and control notes

    Plain-language findings on fragile logic, weak evidence, missing ownership, batch constraints, and audit exposure.

  4. Retention package

    A summary of artifacts, reviewers, dependencies, open questions, and the next work plan for controlled rollout.

Risk priorities

The issues that usually block safe legacy work.

COBOL knowledge risk is often an evidence problem before it is a code problem.

01

Hidden business rules

Business impact

Critical calculations or exceptions sit inside paragraphs, copybooks, tables, or old run procedures.

Control focus

Create a source-cited rule catalog and review it with system owners.

02

Unclear dependencies

Business impact

One change can affect jobs, reports, files, interfaces, and downstream teams that were not in the original plan.

Control focus

Map blast radius before work is estimated or scheduled.

03

Weak audit trail

Business impact

Teams cannot explain why a rule exists, who reviewed it, or which source artifacts support it.

Control focus

Keep findings tied to evidence, reviewers, timestamps, and open questions.

Diagnostic questions

Questions to answer before the next decision.

04 Diagnostic questions

  • Q · 01

    Which systems and data feeds are inside the decision scope?

  • Q · 02

    Which rules must be explained to business, audit, or operations teams?

  • Q · 03

    Where do batch windows, files, copybooks, and interfaces constrain change?

  • Q · 04

    What evidence is required before leaders can trust controlled rollout?

Next step

Start with one controlled knowledge audit.

Send the system scope, current knowledge risk, and review timeline. COBOLpro will shape the first documentation and retention package around that need.